A Comparative Analysis of Intravenous Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine for Hemodynamic Stability and intraoperative bleeding in Lumbar Spine Surgeries

Authors

  • Keerty Garg KCGMC Karnal, India
  • Kiran Sharma KCGMC Karnal, India
  • Gunjan Chaudhary KCGMC Karnal, India
  • Jasbir Kaur Park healing touch Hospital, Ambala, India
  • Mohit Jindal KCGMC Karnal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31636/pmjua.v9i1-2.5

Keywords:

Clonidine, dexmedetomidine, spinal surgery, Alpha 2 agonists

Abstract

Lumbar spine surgeries are complex procedures often associated with challenges in maintaining hemodynamic stability and controlling intraoperative bleeding, which are crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. Clonidine and dexmedetomidine both are α2-adrenergic agonists with sedative and analgesic properties, known for their potential to attenuate sympathetic responses and stabilize hemodynamics. However, their comparative efficacy in lumbar spine surgeries remains underexplored.

METHODOLOGY

This study was carried out in 40 patients, ASA grade1 and 2, undergoing lumbar spinal instrumentation requiring laminectomy. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups (20 each) using the computer generated random number table. Group C received 2 µg/kg of clonidine diluted in 10 ml of normal saline, given slowly intravenous infusion over 10 min before induction of general anaesthesia. Group D received 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine diluted in 10 ml normal saline, given slow intravenous infusion over 10 minutes before induction of general anaesthesia.

Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were monitored before intubation as the baseline and after intubation, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after starting the surgery, and after extubation. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was estimated based on the volume of blood in the suction bottle and the number of the blood-soaked gauze pads (20 mL for a completely blood-soaked gauze and 50 mL for a completely blood-soaked long gauze).

OBSERVATION

No statistically significant difference was found on comparing the two drugs in terms of Baseline characteristics, Mean Arterial Pressure and the amount of blood loss. However Dexmedetomidine group had a higher reduction in Heart Rate as compared to the Clonidine Group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, both the alpha2 agonist drugs; intravenous clonidine and dexmedetomidine represent valuable options for achieving stable hemodynamics as well as decreases the intraoperative surgical bleeding in lumbar spine surgeries. Total opioid requirements for intraoperative and rescue analgesia in postoperative period were decreased in both the groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Sztern B. An overview of blood-sparing techniques used in spine surgery during the perioperative period. European Spine Journal [Internet]. 2004 Jun 15;13(S01):S18–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-0040752-y.

2. Jabalameli M, Hashemi M, Soltani H, Hashemi SJ. Oral clonidine premedication decreases intraoperative bleeding in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences [Internet]. 2005;1:25-30. Available from: https:// www.sid.ir/FileServer/JE/91720050106.

3. Smith A, Stutzman S, Weingarten T, Klineberg E. Dexmedetomidine in spine surgery: A review of its safety and efficacy in the perioperative period. Journal of Spine Surgery. 2018;4(3):663-671.

4. Venn RM, Bradshaw CJ, Spencer R, et al. Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 1999 Dec;54(12):1136–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.13652044.1999.01114.x.

5. Bakhamees HS, El-Halafawy YM. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine for controlled hypotension in nasal surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;29(3):257-262.

6. Ayoglu H, Yapakci O, Ugur MB, Uzun L, Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, et al. Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in reducing bleeding during septoplasty and tympanoplasty operations. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia [Internet]. 2008 Sep;20(6):437–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.04.008.

7. Moore TA, Strickland L, Friend L, Hurdle AC. Dexmedetomidine: A novel alternative for the treatment of preoperative and intraoperative hypertension in a patient undergoing radical nephrectomy: A case report. AANA Journal. 2014;82(2):118-124.

8. Hogue CW, Talke P, Stein PK, Richardson C, Domitrovich PP, Sessler DI. Autonomic Nervous System Responses during Sedative Infusions of Dexmedetomidine. Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2002 Sep 1;97(3):592–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200209000-00012.

9. Janatmakan F, Nesioonpour S, Javaherforoosh Zadeh F, Teimouri A, Vaziri M. Comparing the Effect of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative Bleeding in Spine Surgery. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine [Internet]. 2019 Feb 24;In Press(In Press). Available from: https://doi.org/10.5812/ aapm.83967.

Comparative Analysis of Intravenous Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine for Hemodynamic Stability and Intraoperative Bleeding in Lumbar Spine Surgeries

Downloads

Published

2024-11-05

How to Cite

1.
Garg K, Sharma K, Chaudhary G, Kaur J, Jindal M. A Comparative Analysis of Intravenous Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine for Hemodynamic Stability and intraoperative bleeding in Lumbar Spine Surgeries. PMJUA [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 5 [cited 2026 Mar. 21];9(1-2):37-41. Available from: https://painmedicine.org.ua/index.php/pnmdcn/article/view/360

Issue

Section

Original article

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.