The use of perineural catheters in pediatric population

Authors

  • I. Simić University Children Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia
  • D. Simić University Children Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Z. Stanković University Children Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia
  • I. Petrov University Children Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia
  • M. Stević University Children Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia
  • S. Dučić University Children Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia

Keywords:

perineural catheters, children, regional anesthesia, pain management

Abstract

Perineural catheters (PCs) provide prolonged effect of the peripheral nerve block, and through a percutaneously placed catheter, whose top is near the nerve or nerve plaxus, local anesthetic is titrated to the desired effect. Catheter placement is performed under the control of ultrasound and / or neurostimulator. After placement, tunneling is carried out to ensure the adequate position of the catheter. PCs can be placed on the upper extremities (an extended block of the brachial plexus using an interscalene, supra/infra-clavicular or axillary nerve approach), lower extremities (prolonged lumbosacral plexus block, femoral, ischiadic or popliteal block) and other perineural blocks (thoracic, ilioinguinal, paravertebral, tap etc.) PCs have an increasing implementation on pediatric patients with aim to provide intraoperative anesthesia, postoperative analgesia and chronic pain therapy. Numerous studies on pediatric patients have shown that perineural catheters improve control of postoperative pain and lead to reduced use of opioids, thereby reducing the risk of side effects. The most common use of PCs is in orthopedic surgeries, where they significantly regulate postoperative pain and allow early use of physical therapy, better post-operative recovery, and reduce time of hospitalization. With adequate training of parents, they can be used at home. Due to the small number of contraindications (allergic reaction to local anesthetics, infection on the site of placement, patient refusal), and improvements in clinical, economic and humanistic approach, PCs have an increasingly important application. PCs improve the control of post-operative pain, reduce the use of analgesics and opioids, reduce post-operative complications nausea and vomiting, reduce time spend in hospital, require less treatment costs and improve the satisfaction of children and their parents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

lfeld B. M. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence // Anesth Analg. – 2011. – 113. –P. 904–25.

Doralina L. Anghelescu. Risk of catheter associated infection in young hematology/oncology patients receiving long-term peripheral nerve blocks / Doralina L. Anghelescu, Brittney L. Harris // Paediatr Anaesth. – 2012. – 22 (11).

Visoiu M. The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents / Visoiu M., Joy L. N., Gudziak J. S., Chelly J. E. // Pediatr Anesth. – 2014. – 24 (11). –P. 1141–1148.

Guerci P. Inadvertent peripheral nerve catheter shearing occurring during ultrasound guidance / Guerci P., Novy E., Guibert J., Vial F. // Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. – 2013 May. – 32 (5). – P. 364–7.

Schnabel A. Ultrasound compared with nerve stimulation guidance for peripheral nerve catheter placement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial / Schnabel A., Meyer-Frießem C. H., Zahn P. K., Pogatzki-Zahn E. M. // Br J Anaesth. – 2013 Oct. – 111 (4).

Edward R. Mariano. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block catheters for pain control on pediatric medical missions in developing countries / Edward R. Mariano, Brian M. Ilfeld. // Paediatr Anaesth. – 2008. – 18 (7). – P. 598–601.

Walker B. J. Peripheal nerve catheters in children: an analysis of safety and practice patterns from the pediatric regional anesthesia network (PRAN) / Walker B. J., Long J. B. // British Journal of Anaesthesia. – 2015. – P. 457–62.

Girish Joshi. Peripheral nerve blocks in the management of postoperative pain: challenges and opportunities / Girish Joshi, Kishor Gandhi // Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. – 2016. – 35. – P. 524–52.

Gurnaney H. Ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks in children and adolescents: a longitudinal 8-year single center study / Gurnaney H., Kraemer F. W., Maxwell L. // Anesth Analg. – 2014. – 118. – P. 621–7.

Ahsan Z. S. Incidence of failure of continuous peripheral nerve catheters for postoperative analgesia in upper extremity surgery / Ahsan Z. S., Carvalho B., Yao J. // Hand Surg Am. – 2014 Feb. – 39 (2).

Gologorsky Jr. Contalatheral anesthesia folowing intrascalene block / Gologorsky Jr. // Anestn Analg. – 1992. – 75. – P. 311–312.

Siegenthaler A. Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block, description of a novel supraclavicularapproach / Siegenthaler A., Moriggl B., Mlekusch S., Schliessbach J., Haug M. // Reg Anesth Pain Med. – 2012 May-Jun. – 37 (3). – P. 325–8.

Nowakowski P. Ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus plexus block. Part 1 – basic sonoanatomy / Nowakowski P., Bieryło A. // Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. – 2015. – 47 (4). – P. 409–16.

Benthien J. P. Efficacy of continuous catheter analgesia of the sciatic nerve after total knee arthroplasty // Benthien J. P., Huebner D. // Swiss Med Wkly. – 2015 Feb. – 19. – P. 145.

Creech C. Techniques of popliteal nerve regional anesthesia / Creech C., Meyr A. J. // J Foot Ankle Surg. – 2013 Sep-Oct. – 52 (5). – P. 681–5.

Neuburger M. Inflammation and infection complication 2285 perineural catheters: a prospective study / Neuburger M., Büttner J., Blumenthal S. // Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. – 2007 Jan. – 51 (1). – P. 108–14.

Neuburger M. Complications and adverse events in continuous peripheral regional anesthesia Results of investigations on 3,491 catheters / Neuburger M., Breitbarth J., Reisig F. // Anaesthesist. – 2006 Jan. – 55 (1). – P. 33–40.

Ilfeld B. M. Continuous regional analgesiafollowing ambulatory pediatric orthopedic surgery / Ilfeld B. M., Smith D. W., Enneking F. K. // Am J Orthop. – 2004. – P. 33. – P. 405–408.

Gable A. Home peripheral nerve catheters: the first 24 months of experience at a children’s hospital / Gable A., Burrier C., Stevens J., Wrona S. // J Pain Res. – 2016 Nov. – 18 (9). – P. 1067–1072.

Ganesh A. Continuous peripheral nerve blockadefor inpatient and outpatient postoperative analgesia in children / Ganesh A., Rose J. B., Wells L. et al. // Anesth Analg. – 2007. – 105 (5). – P. 1234–1242.

Gurnaney H. Ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks in children andadolescents: a longitudinal 8-year single center study / Gurnaney H., Kraemer W., Maxwell L.et al. // Anesth Analg. – 2014. – 118 (3). – P. 621–627.

Bhalla T. A proactive risk assessment by utilizing healthcare failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) for safe implementation of peripheral nerve catheters in pediatric patients / Bhalla T., Dairo O. O., Martin D. P. et al. // Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. – 2014. –18. – P. 21–24.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-01

How to Cite

1.
Simić I, Simić D, Stanković Z, Petrov I, Stević M, Dučić S. The use of perineural catheters in pediatric population. PMJUA [Internet]. 2017 Sep. 1 [cited 2022 Jun. 30];2(3):7-10. Available from: https://painmedicine.org.ua/index.php/pnmdcn/article/view/58

Issue

Section

Problem article

Most read articles by the same author(s)